OPSAWG Working Group B. Wu, Ed. Internet-Draft Q. Wu, Ed. Intended status: Standards Track Huawei Expires: 21 March 2023 M. Boucadair, Ed. Orange O. Gonzalez de Dios Telefonica B. Wen Comcast 17 September 2022 A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-10 Abstract The data model for network topologies defined in RFC 8345 introduces vertical layering relationships between networks that can be augmented to cover network and service topologies. This document defines a YANG module for performance monitoring (PM) of both underlay networks and overlay VPN services that can be used to monitor and manage network performance on the topology of both layers. Status of This Memo This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." This Internet-Draft will expire on 21 March 2023. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 1] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/ license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Revised BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2. Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1. Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring Model Usage . 4 3.1. Collecting Data via Pub/Sub Mechanism . . . . . . . . . . 5 3.2. Collecting Data On-demand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Description of The Data Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. Layering Relationship between Multiple Layers of Topology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2. Network Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation . . . . 9 4.3. Node Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation . . . . . 9 4.4. Link and Termination Point Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring YANG Module . 15 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 7. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 8. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 9. Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 Appendix A. Illustrative Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 A.1. VPN Performance Subscription Example . . . . . . . . . . 36 A.2. Example of VPN Performance Snapshot . . . . . . . . . . . 38 A.3. Example of Percentile Monitoring . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 1. Introduction [RFC8969] describes a framework for automating service and network management with YANG [RFC7950] models. It defines that the performance measurement telemetry model should be tied to the services (such as a Layer 3 VPN or Layer 2 VPN) or to the network models to monitor the overall network performance and the Service Level Agreements (SLAs). Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 2] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 The performance of VPN services is associated with the performance changes of the underlay network that carries VPN services, such as the delay of the underlay tunnels and the packet loss status of the device interfaces. Additionally, the integration of Layer 2/Layer 3 VPN performance and network performance data enables the orchestrator to subscribe to VPN service performance in a unified manner. Therefore, this document defines a YANG module for both network and VPN service performance monitoring (PM). The module can be used to monitor and manage network performance on the topology level or the service topology between VPN sites, in particular. This document does not introduce new metrics for network performance or mechanisms for measuring network performance, but uses the existing mechanisms and statistics to monitor the performance of the network and the services. All these metrics are defined as unidirectional metrics. The YANG module defined in this document is designed as an augmentation to the network topology YANG model defined in [RFC8345] and draws on relevant YANG types defined in [RFC6991], [RFC8345], [RFC8532], and [RFC9181]. Appendix A provides a set of examples to illustrate the use of the module. 2. Terminology The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are used in this specification: * augment * data model * data node The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in [RFC7950]. The tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in [RFC8340]. 2.1. Acronyms The following acronyms are used in the document: L2VPN Layer 2 Virtual Private Network L3VPN Layer 3 Virtual Private Network Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 3] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 L2NM L2VPN Network Model L3NM L3VPN Network Model MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching OAM Operations, Administration, and Maintenance OWAMP One-Way Active Measurement Protocol PE Provider Edge PM Performance Monitoring SLA Service Level Agreement TP Termination Point, as defined in [RFC8345] section 4.2 TWAMP Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol VPLS Virtual Private LAN Service VPN Virtual Private Network 3. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring Model Usage Models are key for automating network management operations. According to [RFC8969], together with service and network models, performance measurement telemetry models are needed to monitor network performance to meet specific service requirements (typically captured in an SLA). +---------------+ | Customer | +-------+-------+ | Customer Service Models | | +-------+---------+ | Service | | Orchestration | +------+-+--------+ | | Network Service Models | | Network and VPN Service PM Models | | +------+-+--------+ | Network | | Controller | +-------+---------+ | +-----------------------+------------------------+ Network Figure 1: Reference Architecture Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 4] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 As shown in Figure 1, in the context of the layered model architecture described in [RFC8309], the network and VPN service performance monitoring (PM) model can be used to expose operational performance information to the layer above, e.g., to an orchestrator or other client application, via standard network management APIs. Before using the model, the controller needs to establish complete topology visibility of the network and VPN. For example, the controller can use network information from [RFC8345], [I-D.ietf-opsawg-sap] or VPN information from [RFC9182], [I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm]. Then the controller derives network or VPN level performance data by aggregating (and filtering) lower-level data collected via monitoring counters of the involved devices. The network or VPN performance data can be based on different sources. For example, the performance monitoring data per link in the underlying network can be collected using a network performance measurement method such as One-Way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) [RFC4656], Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP) [RFC5357], Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol(STAMP) [RFC8762], and Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Loss and Delay Measurement [RFC6374]. The performance monitoring information reflecting the quality of the network or VPN service (e.g., end-to- end network performance data between source node and destination node in the network or between VPN sites) can be computed and aggregated, for example, using the information from the Traffic Engineering Database (TED), [RFC7471] [RFC8570] [RFC8571] or LMAP (Large-Scale Measurement Platform) [RFC8194]. The measurement and report intervals that are associated with these performance data usually depend on the configuration of the specific measurement method or collection method or various combinations. This document defines a network-wide measurement interval to align measurement requirements for networks or VPN services. 3.1. Collecting Data via Pub/Sub Mechanism Some applications such as service-assurance applications, which must maintain a continuous view of operational data and state, can use the subscription model specified in [RFC8641] to subscribe to the specific network performance data or VPN service performance data they are interested in, at the data source. For example, network or VPN topology updates may be obtained through on-change notifications [RFC8641]. For dynamic PM data, e.g. VRF routes or MAC entries, link metrics, and interface metrics, various notifications can be specified to obtain more complete data. A periodic notification [RFC8641] can be specified to obtain real-time performance data. For devices/controllers that maintain historical performance data for a Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 5] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 period of time, a replay notification [RFC5277] or [RFC8639] can be used to obtain the historical data. And alarm notifications [RFC8632] can be specified to get alarms for the metrics which exceed or fall below the performance threshold. The data source can, then, use the network and VPN service performance monitoring model defined in this document and the YANG Push model [RFC8641] to distribute specific telemetry data to target recipients. 3.2. Collecting Data On-demand To obtain a snapshot of a large amount of performance data from a network topology or VPN network, service-assurance applications may retrieve information using the network and VPN service PM model through a NETCONF [RFC6241] or a RESTCONF [RFC8040] interface. For example, a specified "link-id" of a VPN can be used as a filter in a RESTCONF GET request to retrieve per-link VPN PM data. 4. Description of The Data Model This document defines the YANG module, "ietf-network-vpn-pm", which is an augmentation to the "ietf-network" and "ietf-network-topology" modules. The performance monitoring data augments the service topology as shown in Figure 2. +----------------------+ +---------------------+ |ietf-network | | | |ietf-network-topology |<---------| ietf-network-vpn-pm | +----------------------+ augments | | +---------------------+ Figure 2: Module Augmentation 4.1. Layering Relationship between Multiple Layers of Topology [RFC8345] defines a YANG data model for network/service topologies and inventories. The service topology described in [RFC8345] includes the virtual topology for a service layer above Layer 1 (L1), Layer 2 (L2), and Layer 3 (L3). This service topology has the generic topology elements of node, link, and terminating point. One typical example of a service topology is described in Figure 3 of [RFC8345]: two VPN service topologies instantiated over a common L3 topology. Each VPN service topology is mapped onto a subset of nodes from the common L3 topology. Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 6] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 Figure 3 illustrates an example of a topology that maps between the VPN service topology and an underlying network: VPN 1 VPN 2 +------------------------+ +------------------------+ / / / / / S1C_[VN3]::: / / / / \ ::::: / / S2A_[VN1]____[VN3]_S2B / / \ ::: / / : : / Overlay / \ :::::::::::: : : / / S1B_[VN2]____[VN1]_S1A / / : : / +---------:-------:------+ +-------:-:----------:---+ : : :::::::::::: : : : : : : : Site-1A : +-------:-:------------------:-------:-----+ Site-1C [CE1]___:_/_______[N1]___________________[N2]___:____/__[CE3] :/ / / \ _____// : / [CE5]_____:_______/ / \ _____/ / :: / Site-2A /: / \ / / :: / / : [N5] / :: / Underlay Network / : / __/ \__ / :: / / : / ___/ \__ /:: / Site-1B / : / ___/ \ /: / Site-2B [CE2]__/________[N4]__________________[N3]________/____[CE4] / / +------------------------------------------+ Legend: N:Node VN:VPN-Node S:Site CE:Customer Edge __ Link within a network layer : Mapping between network layers Figure 3: Example of Topology Mapping Between VPN Service Topology and Underlying Network As shown in Figure 3, two VPN services topologies are built on top of one common underlying physical network: VPN 1: This service topology supports hub-spoke communications for 'customer 1' connecting the customer's access at three sites: 'Site-1A', 'Site-1B', and 'Site-1C'. These sites are connected to nodes that are mapped to node 1 (N1), node 2 (N2), and node 4 (N4) in the underlying physical network. 'Site-1A' plays the role of hub while 'Site-1B' and 'Site-1C' are configured as spoke. VPN 2: This service supports any-to-any communications for 'customer Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 7] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 2' connecting the customer's access at two sites: 'Site-2A' and 'Site-2B'. These sites are connected to nodes that are mapped to nodes 1 (N1) and node 3 (N3) in the underlying physical network. 'Site-2A' and 'Site-2B' have 'any-to-any' role. Apart from the association between the VPN topology and the underlay topology, VPN Network PM YANG module can also provide the performance status of the underlay network and VPN services. For example, the module can provide link PM statistics and port statistics of an underlay network. And it can also provide VPN PM statistics, which can be further split into PM for the VPN tunnel and PM at the VPN PE access node, as illustrated in the following diagram. +-----------------------------------------------------+ | | | VPN2 Link | | |<-------------------->| | | | | | | VPN2+---+---+ +---+---+VPN2 | | TP1| VN1 | Tunnel PM | VN3 |TP2 | | ---+ PE A |==============| PE B +---- | |vpn-access+-------+ +-------+ vpn-access| |-interface| | -interface| | |##############################| | | |inter-vpn-access-interface PM | | | | +-----------------------------------------------------+ | | | | +----+ | TP+-----+ Link +---+ Link +-----+TP | +----+ | CE4+-+----------+ N1 +-------+-N2+-------+ N3 +----------+-+CE5 | +----+ | 1-1+-----+1-2 2-1+---+2-2 3-1+-----+3-2 | +----+ | | | | +-----------------------------------------------------+ Legend: N:node VN:VPN-Node TP:Termination Point -:Link Figure 4: An Example of VPN PM Figure 4 illustrates an example of VPN PM and two VPN PM measurement methods including the VPN tunnel PM and the inter-VPN-access interface PM. VPN PM can also provide statistics on VPN access interfaces, the number of current VRF routes or L2VPN MAC entry of VPN node. Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 8] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 4.2. Network Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation The model can be used for performance monitoring both for the underlay network and the VPN services. The two would be separate entries in the network list [RFC8345]. The differences are as follows: * When the "service" presence container is absent, then it indicates performance monitoring of the network itself. * When the "service" presence container is present, then it indicates performance monitoring of the VPN service specified by the "service-type" leaf, e.g. , L3VPN or Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS). The values are taken from [RFC9181]. When a network topology instance contains the L3VPN or other L2VPN network type, it represents a VPN instance that can perform performance monitoring The tree in Figure 5 is a part of "ietf-network-vpn-pm" tree. It also defines the following set of network level attributes: "vpn-id": Refers to an identifier of VPN service defined in [RFC9181]. This identifier is used to correlate the performance status with the network service configuration. "vpn-service-topology": Indicates the type of the VPN topology. This model supports "any-to-any", "Hub and Spoke" (where Hubs can exchange traffic), and "Hub and Spoke disjoint" (where Hubs cannot exchange traffic) that are taken from [RFC9181]. These VPN topology types can be used to describe how VPN sites communicate with each other. module: ietf-network-vpn-pm augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types: +--rw service! +--rw service-type identityref +--rw vpn-id? vpn-common:vpn-id +--rw vpn-service-topology? identityref Figure 5: Network Level YANG Tree of the Hierarchies 4.3. Node Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation The tree in Figure 6 is the node part of "ietf-network-vpn-pm" tree. For network performance monitoring, the module defines the following attributes: Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 9] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 "node-type": Indicates the device type of Provider Edge (PE), Provider (P) device, or Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) as defined in [RFC4026] and [RFC4364], so that the performance metric between any two nodes each with specific node type can be reported. "entry-summary": Lists a set of IPv4 statistics, IPv6 statistics, and MAC statistics. The detailed statistics are specified separately. For VPN service performance monitoring, the module defines one attribute: "role": Defines the role in a particular VPN service topology. The roles are taken from [RFC9181] (e.g., any-to-any-role, spoke-role, hub-role). augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw node-type? identityref +--ro entry-summary +--ro ipv4-num | +--ro maximum-routes? uint32 | +--ro total-active-routes? uint32 +--ro ipv6-num | +--ro maximum-routes? uint32 | +--ro total-active-routes? uint32 +--ro mac-num +--ro mac-num-limit? uint32 +--ro total-active-mac-num? uint32 augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node: +--rw role? identityref Figure 6: Node Level YANG Tree of the Hierarchies 4.4. Link and Termination Point Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation The tree in Figure 7 is the link and termination point (TP) part of ietf-network-vpn-pm tree. The 'links' are classified into two types: topology link defined in [RFC8345] and abstract link of a VPN between PEs defined in this module. The performance data of a link is a collection of counters and gauges that report the performance status. Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 10] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link: +--rw perf-mon +--rw low-percentile? percentile +--rw intermediate-percentile? percentile +--rw high-percentile? percentile +--rw measurement-interval? uint32 +--ro pm* [pm-type] | +--ro pm-type identityref | +--ro pm-attributes | +--ro start-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro end-time? yang:date-and-time | +--ro pm-source? identityref | +--ro one-way-pm-statistics | | +--ro loss-statistics | | | +--ro packet-loss-count? yang:counter64 | | | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage | | +--ro delay-statistics | | | +--ro unit-value? identityref | | | +--ro min-delay-value? yang:gauge64 | | | +--ro max-delay-value? yang:gauge64 | | | +--ro low-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64 | | | +--ro intermediate-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64 | | | +--ro high-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro jitter-statistics | | +--ro unit-value? identityref | | +--ro min-jitter-value? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro max-jitter-value? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro low-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro intermediate-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro high-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64 | +--ro one-way-pm-statistics-per-class* [class-id] | +--ro class-id string | +--ro loss-statistics | | +--ro packet-loss-count? yang:counter64 | | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage | +--ro delay-statistics | | +--ro unit-value? identityref | | +--ro min-delay-value? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro max-delay-value? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro low-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro intermediate-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64 | | +--ro high-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64 | +--ro jitter-statistics | +--ro unit-value? identityref | +--ro min-jitter-value? yang:gauge64 | +--ro max-jitter-value? yang:gauge64 | +--ro low-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64 | +--ro intermediate-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64 Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 11] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 | +--ro high-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64 +--rw vpn-pm-type +--rw inter-vpn-access-interface | +--rw inter-vpn-access-interface? empty +--rw underlay-tunnel! +--ro vpn-underlay-transport-type? identityref augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point: +--ro pm-statistics +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time +--ro inbound-octets? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-discards? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-errors? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-unknown-protocol? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-octets? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-discards? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-errors? yang:counter64 +--ro vpn-network-access* [network-access-id] +--ro network-access-id vpn-common:vpn-id +--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time +--ro inbound-octets? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-discards? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-errors? yang:counter64 +--ro inbound-unknown-protocol? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-octets? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-non-unicast? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-discards? yang:counter64 +--ro outbound-errors? yang:counter64 Figure 7: Link and Termination point Level YANG Tree of the hierarchies For the data nodes of 'link' depicted in Figure 7, the YANG module defines the following minimal set of link-level performance attributes: Percentile parameters: The module supports reporting delay and jitter metric by percentile values. By default, low percentile (10th percentile), intermediate percentile (50th percentile), high percentile (90th percentile) are used. Setting a percentile to 0.00 indicates the client is not interested in receiving particular percentile. If all percentile nodes are set to 0.00, Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 12] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 this represents that no percentile related nodes will be reported for a given performance metric (e.g., one-way delay, one-way delay variation) and only peak/min values will be reported. For example, a client can inform the server that it is interested in receiving only high percentiles. Then for a given link, at a given "start-time", "end-time" and "measurement-interval", the 'high-delay-percentile' and 'high-jitter-percentile' will be reported. An example to illustrate the use of percentiles is provided in Appendix A.3. Measurement interval ("measurement-interval"): Specifies the performance measurement interval, in seconds. Start time ("start-time"): Indicates the start time of the performance measurement for link statistics. End time ("end-time"): Indicates the end time of the performance measurement for link statistics. PM source ("pm-source"): Indicates the performance monitoring source. The data for the topology link can be based, e.g., on BGP-LS [RFC8571]. The statistics of the VPN abstract links can be collected based upon VPN OAM mechanisms, e.g., OAM mechanisms referenced in [RFC9182], or Ethernet service OAM [ITU-T-Y-1731] referenced in [I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm]. Alternatively, the data can be based upon the underlay technology OAM mechanisms, for example, Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) tunnel OAM. Loss statistics: A set of one-way loss statistics attributes that are used to measure end to end loss between VPN sites or between any two network nodes. The exact loss value or the loss percentage can be reported. Delay statistics: A set of one-way delay statistics attributes that are used to measure end to end latency between VPN sites or between any two network nodes. The peak/min values or percentile values can be reported. Jitter statistics: A set of one-way IP Packet Delay Variation [RFC3393] statistics attributes that are used to measure end to end jitter between VPN sites or between any two network nodes. The peak/min values or percentile values can be reported. PM statistics per class ("one-way-pm-statistics-per-class"): Lists p Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 13] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 erformance measurement statistics for the topology link or the abstract underlay link between VPN PEs with given "class-id" names. The list is defined separately from "one-way-pm- statistics", which is used to collect generic metrics for unspecified "class-id" names. VPN PM type ("vpn-pm-type"): Indicates the VPN performance type, which can be inter-vpn-access-interface PM or VPN underlay-tunnel PM. These two methods are common VPN measurement methods. The inter-VPN-access-interface PM is to monitor the performance of logical point-to-point VPN connections between a source and a destination VPN access interfaces. And the underlay-tunnel PM is to monitor the performance of underlay tunnels of VPNs. The inter-VPN-access-interface PM includes PE-PE monitoring. Therefore, usually only one of the two methods is used. The inter-VPN-access-interface PM is defined as an empty leaf, which is not bound to a specific VPN access interface. The source or destination VPN access interface of the measurement can be augmented as needed. VPN underlay transport type ("vpn-underlay-transport-type"): Indicat es the abstract link protocol-type of a VPN, such as GRE or IP-in- IP. The leaf refers to an identifier of the "underlay-transport" defined in [RFC9181], which describes the transport technology to carry the traffic of the VPN service. In the case of multiple types of tunnels between a single pair of VPN nodes, a separate link for each type of tunnel can be created. For the data nodes of 'termination-point' depicted in Figure 7, the module defines the following minimal set of statistics: Last updatd time ("last-updated"): Indicates the timestamp when the counters were last updated. Inbound statistics: A set of inbound statistics attributes that are used to measure the inbound statistics of the termination point, such as received packets, received packets with errors, etc. Outbound statistics: A set of outbound statistics attributes that are used to measure the outbound statistics of the termination point, such as sent packets, packets that could not be sent due to errors, etc. VPN network access ("vpn-network-access"): Lists counters of the VPN network access defined in [RFC9182] or [I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm]. When multiple VPN network accesses are created using the same physical port, finer-grained metrics can be monitored. If a TP is associated with only a single VPN, this list is not required. Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 14] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 5. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring YANG Module The "ietf-network-vpn-pm" module uses types defined in [RFC8345], [RFC6991], [RFC8532], and [RFC9181]. file "ietf-network-vpn-pm@2022-09-17.yang" module ietf-network-vpn-pm { yang-version 1.1; namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm"; prefix nvp; import ietf-yang-types { prefix yang; reference "RFC 6991: Common YANG Types"; } import ietf-vpn-common { prefix vpn-common; reference "RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs."; } import ietf-network { prefix nw; reference "RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies, Section 6.1"; } import ietf-network-topology { prefix nt; reference "RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies, Section 6.2"; } import ietf-lime-time-types { prefix lime; reference "RFC 8532: Generic YANG Data Model for the Management of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Protocols That Use Connectionless Communications"; } organization "IETF OPSAWG (Operations and Management Area Working Group)"; contact "WG Web: WG List: Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 15] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 Editor: Bo Wu Editor: Mohamed Boucadair Editor: Qin Wu Author: Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Author: Bin Wen "; description "This module defines a model for Network and VPN Service Performance monitoring. Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). This version of this YANG module is part of RFC XXXX (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfcXXXX); see the RFC itself for full legal notices."; // RFC Ed.: update the date below with the date of RFC // publication and remove this note. // RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove // this note. revision 2022-09-17 { description "Initial revision."; reference "RFC XXXX: A YANG Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring"; } identity node-type { description "Base identity for node type"; } identity pe { base node-type; Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 16] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 description "Provider Edge (PE) node type. A PE is the device or set of devices at the edge of the provider network with the functionality that is needed to interface with the customer."; } identity p { base node-type; description "Provider router node type. That is, a router in the core network that does not have interfaces directly toward a customer."; } identity asbr { base node-type; description "Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) node type."; reference "RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)"; } identity pm-source-type { description "Base identity from which specific performance monitoring mechanism types are derived."; } identity pm-source-bgpls { base pm-source-type; description "Indicates BGP-LS as the performance monitoring metric source"; reference "RFC 8571: BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions"; } identity pm-source-owamp { base pm-source-type; description "Indicates One-Way Active Measurement Protocol(OWAMP) as the performance monitoring metric source."; reference "RFC 4656: A One-Way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)"; } identity pm-source-twamp { base pm-source-type; Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 17] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 description "Indicates Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol(TWAMP) as the performance monitoring metric source."; reference "RFC 5357: A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)"; } identity pm-source-stamp { base pm-source-type; description "Indicates Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol(STAMP) as the performance monitoring metric source."; reference "RFC 8762: Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol"; } identity pm-source-y-1731 { base pm-source-type; description "Indicates Ethernet OAM Y.1731 as the performance monitoring metric source."; reference "ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks"; } identity pm-type { description "Base identity for PM type."; } identity pm-type-network-link { base pm-type; description "Indicates that the PM type is for the link in the network topology."; } identity pm-type-vpn-inter-access { base pm-type; description "Indicates that the PM type is for the VPN inter-vpn-access-interface PM to monitor the performance of logical point-to-point VPN connections between a source and a destination VPN access interfaces."; } Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 18] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 identity pm-type-vpn-underlay-tunnel { base pm-type; description "Indicates that the PM type is for the VPN underlay-tunnel to monitor the performance of underlay tunnels of VPNs"; } typedef percentage { type decimal64 { fraction-digits 5; range "0..100"; } description "Percentage to 5 decimal places."; } typedef percentile { type decimal64 { fraction-digits 2; range "0..100"; } description "The percentile is a value between 0 and 100 to 2 decimal places, e.g. 10.00, 99.90 ,99.99 etc.. For example, for a given one-way delay measurement, if the percentile is set to 95.00 and the 95th percentile one-way delay is 2 milliseconds, then the 95 percent of the sample value is less than or equal to 2 milliseconds."; } grouping entry-summary { description "Entry summary grouping used for network topology augmentation."; container entry-summary { config false; description "Container for VPN or network entry summary."; container ipv4-num { leaf maximum-routes { type uint32; description "Indicates the maximum number of IPv4 routes for the VPN or network."; } leaf total-active-routes { type uint32; Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 19] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 description "Indicates total active IPv4 routes for the VPN or network."; } description "IPv4-specific parameters."; } container ipv6-num { leaf maximum-routes { type uint32; description "Indicates the maximum number of IPv6 routes for the VPN or network."; } leaf total-active-routes { type uint32; description "Indicates total active IPv6 routes for the VPN or network."; } description "IPv6-specific parameters."; } container mac-num { leaf mac-num-limit { type uint32; description "Indicates the maximum number of MAC entries for the VPN or network."; } leaf total-active-mac-num { type uint32; description "Indicates the total active MAC entries for the VPN or network."; } description "MAC statistics."; } } } grouping link-loss-statistics { description "Grouping for per link error statistics."; container loss-statistics { description "One-way link loss summarized information."; Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 20] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 reference "RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks"; leaf packet-loss-count { type yang:counter64; description "Total number of lost packets."; } leaf loss-ratio { type percentage; description "Loss ratio of the packets. Express as percentage of packets lost with respect to packets sent."; } } } grouping link-delay-statistics { description "Grouping for per link delay statistics."; container delay-statistics { description "One-way link delay summarized information."; reference "RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks"; leaf unit-value { type identityref { base lime:time-unit-type; } default "lime:milliseconds"; description "Time units, where the options are s, ms, ns, etc."; } leaf min-delay-value { type yang:gauge64; description "Minimum observed one-way delay."; } leaf max-delay-value { type yang:gauge64; description "Maximum observed one-way delay."; } Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 21] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 leaf low-delay-percentile { type yang:gauge64; description "Low percentile of observed one-way delay with specific measurement method."; } leaf intermediate-delay-percentile { type yang:gauge64; description "Intermediate percentile of observed one-way delay with specific measurement method."; } leaf high-delay-percentile { type yang:gauge64; description "High percentile of observed one-way delay with specific measurement method."; } } } grouping link-jitter-statistics { description "Grouping for per link jitter statistics."; container jitter-statistics { description "One-way link jitter summarized information."; reference "RFC 3393: IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM) RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP) ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks"; leaf unit-value { type identityref { base lime:time-unit-type; } default "lime:milliseconds"; description "Time units, where the options are s, ms, ns, etc."; } leaf min-jitter-value { type yang:gauge64; description "Minimum observed one-way jitter."; } leaf max-jitter-value { Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 22] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 type yang:gauge64; description "Maximum observed one-way jitter."; } leaf low-jitter-percentile { type yang:gauge64; description "Low percentile of observed one-way jitter."; } leaf intermediate-jitter-percentile { type yang:gauge64; description "Intermediate percentile of observed one-way jitter."; } leaf high-jitter-percentile { type yang:gauge64; description "High percentile of observed one-way jitter."; } } } grouping tp-svc-telemetry { leaf last-updated { type yang:date-and-time; config false; description "Indicates the time when the counters were last updated."; } leaf inbound-octets { type yang:counter64; description "The total number of octets received on the interface, including framing characters."; } leaf inbound-unicast { type yang:counter64; description "The total number of inbound unicast packets."; } leaf inbound-non-unicast { type yang:counter64; description "The total number of inbound non-unicast (i.e., broadcast or multicast) packets."; } leaf inbound-discards { type yang:counter64; Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 23] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 description "The number of inbound packets that were chosen to be discarded even though no errors had been detected. Possible reasons for discarding such a packet could be to free up buffer space, not enough buffer for too much data, etc."; } leaf inbound-errors { type yang:counter64; description "The number of inbound packets that contained errors."; } leaf inbound-unknown-protocol { type yang:counter64; description "The number of packets received via the interface which were discarded because of an unknown or unsupported protocol."; } leaf outbound-octets { type yang:counter64; description "The total number of octets transmitted out of the interface, including framing characters."; } leaf outbound-unicast { type yang:counter64; description "The total number of outbound unicast packets."; } leaf outbound-non-unicast { type yang:counter64; description "The total number of outbound non unicast (i.e., broadcast or multicast) packets."; } leaf outbound-discards { type yang:counter64; description "The number of outbound packets which were chosen to be discarded even though no errors had been detected to prevent their being transmitted. Possible reasons for discarding such a packet could be to free up buffer space, not enough buffer for too much data, etc."; } leaf outbound-errors { type yang:counter64; Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 24] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 description "The number of outbound packets that contained errors."; } description "Grouping for interface service telemetry."; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types" { description "Defines the service topologies types."; container service { presence "Presence of the container indicates a service topology, absence of the container indicates an underlay network."; description "Container for VPN service."; leaf service-type { type identityref { base vpn-common:service-type; } mandatory true; description "This indicates the network service type, e.g., L3VPN, VPLS, etc."; } leaf vpn-id { type vpn-common:vpn-id; description "VPN identifier."; } leaf vpn-service-topology { type identityref { base vpn-common:vpn-topology; } description "VPN service topology, e.g., hub-spoke, any-to-any, hub-spoke-disjoint."; } } } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" { description "Augments the network node with other general attributes."; leaf node-type { type identityref { Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 25] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 base node-type; } description "Node type, e.g., PE, P, ASBR."; } uses entry-summary; } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" { when '../nw:network-types/nvp:service' { description "Augments only for VPN node attributes."; } description "Augments the network node with VPN specific attributes."; leaf role { type identityref { base vpn-common:role; } default "vpn-common:any-to-any-role"; description "Role of the node in the VPN."; } } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link" { description "Augments the network topology link with performance monitoring attributes."; container perf-mon { description "Container for PM attributes."; leaf low-percentile { type percentile; default "10.00"; description "Low percentile to report. Setting low-percentile into 0.00 indicates the client is not interested in receiving low percentile."; } leaf intermediate-percentile { type percentile; default "50.00"; description "Intermediate percentile to report. Setting intermediate-percentile into 0.00 indicates the client is not interested in receiving intermediate percentile."; } Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 26] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 leaf high-percentile { type percentile; default "95.00"; description "High percentile to report. Setting high-percentile into 0.00 indicates the client is not interested in receiving high percentile."; } leaf measurement-interval { type uint32 { range "1..max"; } units "seconds"; default "60"; description "Indicates the time interval to perform PM measurement over."; } list pm { key "pm-type"; config false; description "The list of PM based on PM type"; leaf pm-type { type identityref { base pm-type; } config false; description "The PM type of the measured PM attributes"; } container pm-attributes { description "Container for PM attributes."; leaf start-time { type yang:date-and-time; config false; description "The time that the current measurement started."; } leaf end-time { type yang:date-and-time; config false; description "The time that the current measurement ended."; } leaf pm-source { type identityref { Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 27] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 base pm-source-type; } config false; description "The OAM tool used to collect the PM data."; } container one-way-pm-statistics { config false; description "Container for link telemetry attributes."; uses link-loss-statistics; uses link-delay-statistics; uses link-jitter-statistics; } list one-way-pm-statistics-per-class { key "class-id"; config false; description "The list of PM data based on class of service."; leaf class-id { type string; description "The class-id is used to identify the class of service. This identifier is internal to the administration."; } uses link-loss-statistics; uses link-delay-statistics; uses link-jitter-statistics; } } } } } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/perf-mon" { when '../../nw:network-types/nvp:service' { description "Augments only for VPN Network topology."; } description "Augments the network topology link with VPN service performance monitoring attributes."; container vpn-pm-type { description "The VPN PM type of this logical point-to-point unidirectional VPN link."; container inter-vpn-access-interface { Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 28] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 description "Indicates inter-vpn-access-interface PM, which is to monitor the performance of logical point-to-point VPN connections between a source and a destination VPN access interfaces."; leaf inter-vpn-access-interface { type empty; description "This is a placeholder for inter-vpn-access-interface PM, which is not bound to a specific VPN access interface. The source or destination VPN access interface of the measurement can be augmented as needed."; } } container underlay-tunnel { presence "Enables VPN underlay tunnel PM"; description "Indicates underlay-tunnel PM, which is to monitor the performance of underlay tunnels of VPNs."; leaf vpn-underlay-transport-type { type identityref { base vpn-common:protocol-type; } config false; description "The leaf indicates the underlay transport type of a VPN service, e.g., GRE, LDP, etc."; } } } } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point" { description "Augments the network topology termination point with performance monitoring attributes."; container pm-statistics { config false; description "Container for termination point PM attributes."; uses tp-svc-telemetry; } } augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" + "/nt:termination-point/pm-statistics" { when '../../../nw:network-types/nvp:service' { Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 29] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 description "Augments only for VPN Network topology."; } description "Augments the network topology termination-point with VPN service performance monitoring attributes"; list vpn-network-access { key "network-access-id"; description "The list of PM based on VPN network accesses."; leaf network-access-id { type vpn-common:vpn-id; description "The reference to an identifier for the VPN network access."; } uses tp-svc-telemetry; } } } 6. Security Considerations The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]. The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341] provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol operations and content. There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config) to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative effect on network operations. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability: Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 30] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 * "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types": This subtree specifies the VPN service type, VPN identifier and VPN service topology. Unauthorized access to this subtree may disable the VPN PM or render the VPN service type, VPN identifier, or VPN service topology invalid. * "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node": This subtree specifies the network node type and VPN service topology role. Unauthorized access to this subtree may render the node type or the VPN service topology invalid. * "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/nvp:perf-mon": This subtree specifies the PM of the network link and VPN link. Unauthorized access to this subtree can impact the network and VPN monitoring. Some readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification) to these data nodes. These are the subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability: * "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node": Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the operational state information of underlay network instances or VPN instances. * "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/nvp:perf-mon/nvp:one-way-pm- statistics": Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the operational state information of underlay network links or VPN abstract links. * "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point/nvp:pm- statistics": Unauthorized access to this subtree can disclose the operational state information of underlay network termination points or VPN network accesses. This YANG module does not define any RPC (Remote Procedure Call) operations and Actions. 7. IANA Considerations This document requests IANA to register the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]: URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm Registrant Contact: The IESG. XML: N/A, the requested URI is an XML namespace. Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 31] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 This document requests IANA to register the following YANG module in the "YANG Module Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" registry. Name: ietf-network-vpn-pm Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm Maintained by IANA: N Prefix: nvp Reference: RFC XXXX (RFC Ed.: replace XXXX with actual RFC number and remove this note.) 8. Acknowledgements Thanks to Joe Clarke, Adrian Farrel, Tom Petch, Greg Mirsky, Roque Gagliano, Erez Segev, and Dhruv Dhody for reviewing and providing important input to this document. 9. Contributors The following authors contributed significantly to this document: Michale Wang Huawei Email:wangzitao@huawei.com Roni Even Huawei Email: ron.even.tlv@gmail.com Change Liu China Unicom Email: liuc131@chinaunicom.cn Honglei Xu China Telecom Email: xuhl6@chinatelecom.cn 10. References 10.1. Normative References [ITU-T-Y-1731] ITU-T, "Operator Ethernet Service Definition", August 2015, . Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 32] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 [RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393, DOI 10.17487/RFC3393, November 2002, . [RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688, DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004, . [RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February 2006, . [RFC4656] Shalunov, S., Teitelbaum, B., Karp, A., Boote, J., and M. Zekauskas, "A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)", RFC 4656, DOI 10.17487/RFC4656, September 2006, . [RFC5357] Hedayat, K., Krzanowski, R., Morton, A., Yum, K., and J. Babiarz, "A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)", RFC 5357, DOI 10.17487/RFC5357, October 2008, . [RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020, DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010, . [RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011, . [RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011, . [RFC6374] Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374, DOI 10.17487/RFC6374, September 2011, . [RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types", RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013, . Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 33] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 [RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language", RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016, . [RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017, . [RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams", BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018, . [RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341, DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018, . [RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N., Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March 2018, . [RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018, . [RFC8532] Kumar, D., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Ed., Rahman, R., and S. Raghavan, "Generic YANG Data Model for the Management of Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) Protocols That Use Connectionless Communications", RFC 8532, DOI 10.17487/RFC8532, April 2019, . [RFC8571] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Tantsura, J., and C. Filsfils, "BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Advertisement of IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions", RFC 8571, DOI 10.17487/RFC8571, March 2019, . [RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641, September 2019, . [RFC8762] Mirsky, G., Jun, G., Nydell, H., and R. Foote, "Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol", RFC 8762, DOI 10.17487/RFC8762, March 2020, . Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 34] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 [RFC9181] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., and Q. Wu, "A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9181, DOI 10.17487/RFC9181, February 2022, . 10.2. Informative References [I-D.ietf-opsawg-l2nm] Boucadair, M., Dios, O. G. D., Barguil, S., and L. A. Munoz, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2 VPNs", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-l2nm-19, 2 June 2022, . [I-D.ietf-opsawg-sap] Boucadair, M., Dios, O. G. D., Barguil, S., Wu, Q., and V. Lopez, "A YANG Network Model for Service Attachment Points (SAPs)", Work in Progress, Internet-Draft, draft-ietf- opsawg-sap-09, 28 July 2022, . [RFC4026] Andersson, L. and T. Madsen, "Provider Provisioned Virtual Private Network (VPN) Terminology", RFC 4026, DOI 10.17487/RFC4026, March 2005, . [RFC5277] Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Event Notifications", RFC 5277, DOI 10.17487/RFC5277, July 2008, . [RFC7471] Giacalone, S., Ward, D., Drake, J., Atlas, A., and S. Previdi, "OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions", RFC 7471, DOI 10.17487/RFC7471, March 2015, . [RFC8194] Schoenwaelder, J. and V. Bajpai, "A YANG Data Model for LMAP Measurement Agents", RFC 8194, DOI 10.17487/RFC8194, August 2017, . [RFC8309] Wu, Q., Liu, W., and A. Farrel, "Service Models Explained", RFC 8309, DOI 10.17487/RFC8309, January 2018, . [RFC8570] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Giacalone, S., Ward, D., Drake, J., and Q. Wu, "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric Extensions", RFC 8570, DOI 10.17487/RFC8570, March 2019, . Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 35] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 [RFC8632] Vallin, S. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for Alarm Management", RFC 8632, DOI 10.17487/RFC8632, September 2019, . [RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard, E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications", RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019, . [RFC8969] Wu, Q., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Lopez, D., Xie, C., and L. Geng, "A Framework for Automating Service and Network Management with YANG", RFC 8969, DOI 10.17487/RFC8969, January 2021, . [RFC9182] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Munoz, L., and A. Aguado, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9182, DOI 10.17487/RFC9182, February 2022, . Appendix A. Illustrative Examples A.1. VPN Performance Subscription Example The example shown in Figure 8 illustrates how a client subscribes to the performance monitoring information between nodes ('node-id') A and B in the L3 network topology. The performance monitoring parameter that the client is interested in is end-to-end loss. POST /restconf/operations /ietf-subscribed-notifications:establish-subscription { "ietf-subscribed-notifications:input": { "stream-subtree-filter": { "ietf-network:networks": { "network": { "network-id": "foo:vpn1", "ietf-network-vpn-pm:service": { "service-type": "ietf-vpn-common:l3vpn" }, "node": [ { "node-id": "A", "ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "PE", "termination-point": [ { "tp-id": "1-0-1" } Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 36] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 ] }, { "node-id": "B", "ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "PE", "termination-point": [ { "tp-id": "2-0-1" } ] } ], "ietf-network-topology:link": [ { "link-id": "A-B", "source": { "source-node": "A" }, "destination": { "dest-node": "B" }, "ietf-network-vpn-pm: perf-mon": { "pm": [ { "pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-underlay-tunnel", "pm-attributes": { "one-way-pm-statistics": { "loss-statistics": { "packet-loss-count": {} } } } } ], "vpn-pm-type": { "underlay-tunnel": { "vpn-underlay-transport-type": "ietf-vpn-common:gre" } } } } ] } }, "ietf-yang-push:periodic": { "ietf-yang-push:period": "500" } } Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 37] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 } } Figure 8: Pub/Sub Retrieval A.2. Example of VPN Performance Snapshot This example, depicted in Figure 9, illustrates an VPN PM instance example in which a client uses RESTCONF [RFC8040] to fetch the performance data of the link and TP belonged to "VPN1". { "ietf-network:networks": { "network": { "network-id": "foo:vpn1", "node": [ { "node-id": "A", "ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "PE", "termination-point": [ { "tp-id": "1-0-1", "ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-statistics": { "inbound-octets": "100", "outbound-octets": "150" } } ] }, { "node-id": "B", "ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "PE", "termination-point": [ { "tp-id": "2-0-1", "ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-statistics": { "inbound-octets": "150", "outbound-octets": "100" } } ] } ], "ietf-network-topology:link": [ { "link-id": "A-B", "source": { "source-node": "A" Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 38] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 }, "destination": { "dest-node": "B" }, "ietf-network-pm:perf-mon": { "pm": [ { "pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-underlay-tunnel", "pm-attributes": { "one-way-pm-statistics": { "loss-statistics": { "packet-loss-count": "120" } } } } ], "vpn-pm-type": { "underlay-tunnel": { "vpn-underlay-transport-type": "ietf-vpn-common:gre" } } } } ] } } } Figure 9 A.3. Example of Percentile Monitoring This is an example of percentile measurement data that could be returned for a link foo:vpn1-link1 between vpn-node1 and vpn-node3. Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 39] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 { "ietf-network-topology:link": [ { "link-id": "foo:vpn1-link1", "source": { "source-node": "vpn-node1" }, "destination": { "dest-node": "vpn-node3" }, "ietf-network-vpn-pm:perf-mon": { "low-percentile": "20.00", "intermediate-percentile": "50.00", "high-percentile": "90.00", "pm": [ { "pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-inter-access", "pm-attributes": { "one-way-pm-statistics": { "delay-statistics": { "unit-value": "lime:milliseconds", "min-delay-value": "43", "max-delay-value": "99", "low-delay-percentile": "64", "intermediate-delay-percentile": "77", "high-delay-percentile": "98" } } } } ], "vpn-pm-type": { "inter-vpn-access-interface": { "inter-vpn-access-interface": [null] } } } } ] } Authors' Addresses Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 40] Internet-Draft Network and VPN Service PM YANG September 2022 Bo Wu (editor) Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing Jiangsu, 210012 China Email: lana.wubo@huawei.com Qin Wu (editor) Huawei 101 Software Avenue, Yuhua District Nanjing Jiangsu, 210012 China Email: bill.wu@huawei.com Mohamed Boucadair (editor) Orange Rennes 35000 France Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Oscar Gonzalez de Dios Telefonica Madrid Spain Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com Bin Wen Comcast Email: bin_wen@comcast.com Wu, et al. Expires 21 March 2023 [Page 41]