CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_ Reported by Urs Eppenberger/SWITCH Minutes of the Notifications and Acknowledgements Requirements Working Group (NOTARY) The NOTARY Working Group met at the 32nd IETF on Monday, 3 April and Thursday, 6 April. Draft Agenda o Identify and resolve all outstanding issues on the following documents: (1) draft-ietf-notary-mime-delivery-04.txt (Monday) (2) draft-ietf-notary-smtp-drpt-03.txt (Monday) (3) draft-ietf-notary-mime-report-01.txt (Thursday) (4) draft-ietf-notary-status-01.txt (Thursday) o Presentation and approval of revised documents; decide on document fate o New working groups for remaining issues like receipt notifications and vacation notices Document Review o Walk through of (1) draft-ietf-notary-mime-delivery-04.txt - Section 2 started the discussion of whether the content-type should be specific for delivery status notifications as proposed in (1) (message/delivery-status) or if a general type should be used as proposed in (3). The decision: (1) stays as is, (3) will be adjusted. - Section 2.3.6: Should a `X-protocol-diagnostic:' mechanism allow to tunnel diagnostic information from protocol A to B to A? The decision: (1) stays as is. o Walk through of (2) draft-ietf-notary-smtp-drpt-03.txt - Section 7.2.7 and 7.2.8 are replaced and presented on Thursday. o Between Monday and Thursday all four documents have been updated. o Final review of (3) draft-ietf-notary-mime-report-01.txt - Document changes and general content is blessed. o Review of (4) draft-ietf-notary-status-01.txt - The document is basically stable. It goes onto the standards track. o Final review of (1) draft-ietf-notary-mime-delivery-04.txt - Action: RELAYED/DELIVERED needs better text provided by John Myers. - Action: send the Internet-Draft to IANA to check on the procedure for the registration. o Final review of (2) draft-ietf-notary-smtp-drpt-03.txt - Action: John Myers to provide text about what to do when messages with invalid forward and return path arrive. Definition of the Next Steps All documents go onto the Standards track. o April 14 -- Incorporate comments from the list and the meeting o April 21 -- New Internet-Draft o April 21 -- Working group last call o May 5 -- Comment deadline o May 5 -- Send to the IESG as Proposed Standards o May 5 -- IESG Last Call Other E-mail Extensions A number of other e-mail extensions have been discussed in a short session: o Receipt Notifications o Vacation o Moderator information o Change of address o Voting o Signature o Auto-submitted Tagging of messages as reports is considered a useful functionality since o it distinguishes reports from interpersonal messages, o enables language translation and o enables UAs to process the response. Receipt Notifications provide important functionality. AOB Ned Freed and Einard Stefferud will write a charter for a working group. Roger Fajman agreed to be document editor and to assist with the charter.