Remote Network Monitoring WG (rmonmib) Monday, November 18 at 1300-1500 ================================ CHAIR: Andy Bierman AGENDA: Internet Drafts: ---------------- (A) RMON Framework http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmonmib-framework-02.txt (B) RAQMON Framework http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-siddiqui-rmonmib-raqmon-framework-00.txt (C) RAQMON PDU http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-siddiqui-rmonmib-raqmon-pdu-00.txt (D) RAQMON MIB http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-siddiqui-rmonmib-raqmon-mib-02.txt (E) DHCP Option for SNMP Notification http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bakke-dhc-snmp-trap-01.txt --- 1) Implementation Reports (20 min) Discussion of the implementation reports for: - SMON MIB (RFC 2613) Advancement - RMON2-MIB (RFC 2021) Advancement - RMON-PI (RFC 2074) Advancement Goals: - Determine if RFC 2021 should be advanced by deprecating unimplemented objects or not advanced at this time. 2) RMON Framework Document (30 min) Discussion of the RMON Framework document (A) Goals: - Determine if the framework is complete and ready for WG Last Call 3) Real-time Application Quality of Service Monitoring (70 min) Discussion of the RAQMON Framework (B) Goals: - Determine if the framework is complete - Should the framework provide extensibility and allow for future PDU types and/or delivery mechanisms Discussion of the RAQMON PDU (C) Goals: - Determine if the PDU contains all appropriate fields - Should there be different high-level conformance levels to allow devices to subset the PDU fields in a consistent manner? - Should devices which use the SNMP Notification transport be required to support any command responder features? - Can the 'DHCP Option for SNMP' (E) mechanism be used to fully configure RAQMON devices which use the SNMP based PDU? Discussion of the RAQMON MIB (D) Goals: - Determine (if possible) if the MIB is complete for: - configuration - reported attributes collected from RAQMON PDU