1. The Agenda of the meeting had 2 main topics: IPFC Draft Issues and MIB proposals. The status of the draft and the milestones were also addressed, along with the next step. 2. There were 5 main issues with the existing Draft: - FARP - IPv6 Hooks - Hardware Type in ARP packets 3. Issues with FARP were related to: - Port ID in FARP Payload - Silent Response to FARP - FARP Time out - FC Layer Mappings - FC-VI FARP Requirements & Proposal - Responder Flag Setting Restrictions Presentation from Raj Bhagwat (Gadzoox Networks) addressed all issues and proposed resolutions. All issues were resolved during the meeting based on the proposed resolutions with a minor change in wording for FC Layer Mappings. (See Presentation). Jon Infante from Emulex said he will post 1 additional issue for discussion on the ipfc reflecter. 4. A Fabric MIB was proposed by Kha Sin Teow from Brocade Communications. The WG accepted the proposal. There was only one issue in the MIB that the author said he will correct. This had to do with the nature of proposed MIB (Experimental ). The new ID will not make it experimental in the MIB tree. The schedule on this effort was submit an ID soon and try to publish this as an Proposed RFC by Dec 98. 5. An Inteconnect MIB was proposed by Kim Banker from Gadzoox Networks. The synergy between this MIB and the Fabric MIB was discussed. It was decided that the Interconnect MIB will describe the relationship. Kim Banker positioned this MIB to be higher in the hierarchy compared to the Fabric MIB. The Chair of the WG recommended that this contain in a separate Frame Work Document. Kim Banker was tasked to do this. The schedule for this proposal was Dec 99. 6. It was decidied in the WG that the ID can move very quickly to an RFC soon after the meeting and resolving one outstanding issue that will be posted by Jon Infante. I recommend that we adopt both MIBs as work items.